Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a common belief that domestic movies and TV shows are enough for a country. However, I firmly believe foreign TV programmes have a valuable impact on a country’s development.
On the one hand, there are those who argue that movies and programmes should be produced domestically. The main reason is that local programmes contribute to keeping the nation’s culture intact. These programmes usually impart traditional celebrations, religious rituals, and religious beliefs. This not only helps residents gain intense knowledge of their country but also influences their moral behaviour. East Asia countries, for example, are popular with Buddhism, the people are likely to believe in karma. Their movies tend to strengthen their strong conviction that they might deserve luck and peacefulness in the future if they did good deeds.
On the other hand, I side with those who concur that foreign movies and TV shows should be imported. The salient argument is that they help improve people’s intellectual level. Through outside movies and programmes, people can learn different cultures and other languages. For instance, in Vietnam, many English TV shows and films are used as enormous resources for learning English. This might be an interesting educational approach for learners than boring books. As a result, the people generally raise their English ability than before. This opens a window of opportunities for students to pursue learning abroad or for local companies to collab with foreign organizations.
In conclusion that importing foreign films and TV shows should be encouraged to gain their benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | suaadma6 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Tran Bao Long | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | Tran Bao Long | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-11 | hoangquyen1904 | 89 | view |
| 2017-11-06 | Murphet | 78 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83502239459 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.8110745044 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256692257738 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804757848684 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377795056182 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151584374152 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344880055219 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.