Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money to wild animals protecting projects because we as humans have no need for them. I completely disagrees with this view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals play no role in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exist solely for the benefit of humans. We as other species are heavily dependent on the environment to survival, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means we suddenly have rights to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let wild animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square meter of land to feed or accommodate world’s population. Humans and wild animals absolutely could exist side by side.
I also disagree with the idea that conservation programs are wasting our resources and money. Most scientists agree that the protection of natural habitats not only ensures the survival of wild animals, but also are crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilize the Earth’s climate. If we destroy these are, the cost of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the cost of conservation. Therefore, by protecting wild animals and their habitats, we could maintain the balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-07 | Tran Bao Long | 78 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish discuss both views and give your own op 61
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building where they live in What are the reasons for this how can people research this 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93511450382 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64907769044 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7652014407 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274749992696 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909014920684 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628522919471 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178362149096 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259835173791 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93511450382 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64907769044 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7652014407 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274749992696 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909014920684 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628522919471 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178362149096 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259835173791 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.