Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV ot playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many individuals argue that reading books are more beneficial compared to excessive exposure screen time. While I think that reading a book can bring more benefits for children, I believe that watching TV or playing games on the computer do good as well.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of reading book. Kids can enhance verbal ability because books often contain a wide range of complex sentences and vocabularies. Also, different kinds of books such as science fiction, fairy tail may equip fundamental knowledge for children about various aspects of life. For example, kids who read more stories about the universe or galaxy is more likely to memorize names, shapes or geographical information than those who do not. As a result, it could help children to improve their writing skills and boost their confidence, which is necessary in their latter life
On the other hand, I think that the benefits of watching TV or playing video game are also undeniable. In terms of watching TV, educational television might give children chances to absorb useful information more easily. The reason is that programmes on the television are made with eye-catching images and easy-to-understand content. Educational channels like discovery, off the great wall, for instance, may create a favorable condition for kids to expose lifestyles, cultures and values, which they do not encounter in daily life. In addition, educational game such as Bucha can help kids increase their vocabulary.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that both reading stories from a book and sedentary activities can be equal useful for children
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-15 | thiên định | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend on watching TV and encourag 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nefits of reading book. Kids can enhance verbal ability because books often conta...
^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iry tail may equip fundamental knowledge for children about various aspects of li...
^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e who do not. As a result, it could help children to improve their writing skills...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overy, off the great wall, for instance, may create a favorable condition for kid...
^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok and sedentary activities can be equal useful for children
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20610687023 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82297259826 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9509200005 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287466536314 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102028985502 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905378667866 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191041045072 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621777499672 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.