Some people believe that social media sites, such as Facebook or Twitter, have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships. Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way.
new types of technology mean that you can easily connect with people throughout the world. Many believe that this is harmful and prevents us from forming meaningful friendships with others, while some people argue that using social media improves our ability to build new relationships. In my opinion, the negative impact is greater than the benefits, as I will explain.
Firstly, let us consider what makes a meaningful relationship. Being able to talk and meet with people is key and this can be done in person in the traditional way, or, increasingly, online. However, seeing people in the real world is very different from meeting them online. you can learn more about them and see them at both their best and their worst; therefore, your relationship is based on more than short text communication.
Many argue that modern social media allows us to connect with a variety of people from different places and backgrounds, which can be true. Nevertheless, these websites often lead young people into dangerous situations, for example, they may be bullied because of how they look. Also, their personal information becomes available to all if they are not careful and they never really know who they are connecting with.
While it is true that social media sites can be very useful and help us to connect and keep in touch with others, we need to be careful and not forget that we can only make real friends in the real world. I personally believe that these are the relationships that last a lifetime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | nahid_tavasspli | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Phương_Anh' | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | Bibek Regmi | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | Bibek Regmi | 61 | view |
| 2022-05-17 | anhvu010197@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computersor television or of studying at traditional schools.Which would you prefer? Use reasons and specific details to explain your choice. 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 73
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 83
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 61
- The table below gives information about the value NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
new types of technology mean that you can e...
^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: You
...ery different from meeting them online. you can learn more about them and see them ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9140625 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63797713027 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6015625 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4500343707 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249188471986 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929286885127 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571158902552 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146831228894 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370784849398 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.