some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time .This can benefit teenageers and the community as well .to what extent do you agree or disagree?
The repercussions of philanthropic activities are satisfactory and will completely change civilization. I have no inherent problem with a youngster engaging in volunteer activities since it will assist their organization in a big way. Post-success and the underemployment restriction are the two implications of having young people labor during their leisure time for their community.
The organization will experience accomplishment on all facets if the kids strive toward efficiently managing pathways in society or raising knowledge and understanding of cleanliness. For illustration, he can allocate each team to a particular mission from all angles, such as sweeping or promoting the public's awareness through the teaching profession, etc. Furthermore, the general populace must assemble a group of teens to cleanse the routes as well as other approaches back privileges for them. In addition, they cannot compel them. If, for instance, that does not have a consequence on their education, we must take their ideas into consideration. Youth will eventually experience proliferation everywhere if they work with each other for their society.
It doesn't matter whether adolescents labor during their recreational time when numerous are now destitute. With that being said, if a youngster were jobless, he or she might consider doing something for their association rather than be unproductive. Additionally, by helping his nation grow and advance, he or she would be making a positive contribution to the world. The youngsters might, for instance, work with the association and receive advantages for good job performance and self-discipline instead of spending all day using computers and playing electronic games. Less joblessness in the neighborhood is a result of the quick contribution effort.
To sum up, post-accomplishment and joblessness limitation are the two attributes of a young person's voluntary fight for an organization. We must refrain from excluding children from donation work. All people are compelled to fit into specific categories.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Cohabitation is believed to bring huge advantages for young people since it enables them to fully understand each other before deciding to get married Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that historical buildings should be knocked down while others believe that they should be preserved and restored instead Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- Describe a memorable event of your life 11
- some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenageers and the community as well to what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by select 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...gles, such as sweeping or promoting the publics awareness through the teaching professi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... with each other for their society. It doesnt matter whether adolescents labor during...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'person'?
Suggestion: person
...ation are the two attributes of a young persons voluntary fight for an organization. We...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69805194805 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45371993603 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63961038961 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.805562839 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.235294118 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101961293142 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307549818448 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310408408654 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591090047233 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199102576168 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.