Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crimes, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishments.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Feasible methods to confront the accelerating rate of crimes have become a highly debated topic recently. While some people side with inflexible sentences, I find it more convincing to believe that punishments should take into account hidden reasons for law-breaking actions and criminals’ personal backgrounds.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why some people believe that making punishments irrevocable can save a great deal of time and money. This is due to the fact that prosecutors might not need to hire attorney for plaintiff and that jury trials which is extremely time-consuming. Meanwhile, a large portion of governmental investment can be prioritise to improve public facilities and infrastructure. For example, developed countries such as Japan, who have strict civil law, has emphasised the science education of their own citizens. This strong focus has lead to scientific discovery fostering innovation and increasing productivity, which directly contributes to the prosperity and stability of the whole society.
On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that flexible sentences may bring some possible advantages. First and foremost, we have long experienced a history of cases when perpetrators have either lacked awareness or suffered from mental issues. In this case, instead of capital punishment or death penalty, psychiatric treatments and proper education should be suitable for them so as not to reoffend. This is often the case in teenagers as the accelerating rate of juvenile deliquencies is corrolated to the lack of parental guidance and supervisor. Therefore, they tend to commit illegal actions including vandalism and alcohol abuse. Another reason would be that peer pressure catalysing their desire to try on new experiences even if it might lead to committing crimes. Finally, it has long experienced a history of cases where perpetrators plead for mercy and show regrets. In these case, capital punishment or death penalty is unecessary.
In conclusion, there have been many social unrests to solve the riddle of which approach is more beneficial for a nation. While there is a strong case for fixed sanctions, I am more inclined to the view that crimes should be considered in many aspects including the motivation for committing before returning a verdict.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- The best way to solve world's environmental problem is increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion. 11
- Farmers within a country are often protected by tariffs that is special taxes on imported food Such policy are necessary and should be implemented wherever possible To what extend do you agree with this 77
- According to a recent study the more time people use the Internet the less time they spend with real human beings Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world wide we should be concerned 91
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last ten years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'believing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: believing
...le sentences, I find it more convincing to believe that punishments should take into accou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45856353591 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04758612729 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2357715782 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.235294118 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270353571772 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715512927764 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715235642865 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161816694948 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375208327887 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.