The best way to solve world's environmental problem is increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion.
In recent years, there is a phenomenon that governments impose heavier taxes on petrol in order to stop its detrimental effects on the environment. The issue of whether this approach is effective enough to prevent environmental degradation remains a source of controversy. While there is a strong case for this, I personally believe that some other measures should be given equal consideration.
It is undeniable that increasing tax on fuel industry would be an ineffecient strategy reducing its environmental impacts. In other words, people should acknowledge the fact that the demand for petrol is generally inelastic, at least in the short run. As the consumption of petrol is more likely not to be vary significantly according to the fluctuation of petrol price due to city dwellers’ excessive reliance and obsession on fossil fuel-based cars, die effort to reduce reduce greenhouse gases emission by curbing cars cannot achieve any immediate outcome unless with sufficient time. For example, despite higher tax rates, there are now even an growing number of private cars, leaving carbon footprint worsening the air quality.
On the other hand, I would advocate with those who contend that others method would be much more effective to deal with the detrimental impacts it may exert than the aforementioned approach. Instead, people should turn to fuel-efficient cars or reduce non-essential trips, both resulting in the drop in petrol usage. This can be done if car manufacturers enlarge research and development investment in producing hybrid cars or cars powered by renewable clean energy sources, a cure-all for car emission problems. Another rationale is that when it comes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, people should take different methods simultaneously, instead of relying on any single method only.
In conclusion, although it might be true that raising tax on fuel can be an effective solution to alleviate environmental degradation, I am more inclined to the view that governments should take into account others measures to tackle with this pressing issue.
- Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world. That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and r 84
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world.What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 84
- Farmers within a country are often protected by tariffs that is special taxes on imported food Such policy are necessary and should be implemented wherever possible To what extend do you agree with this 77
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last ten years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 84
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: reduce
...n fossil fuel-based cars, die effort to reduce reduce greenhouse gases emission by curbing ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...te higher tax rates, there are now even an growing number of private cars, leaving...
^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ld advocate with those who contend that others method would be much more effective to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43251533742 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06850443172 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3019677425 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.583333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554994509917 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237569060139 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301492482021 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375589835578 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179049812961 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.