Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of all kinds of community services and their corresponding impacts have sparked massive debates. In this regard, a number of individuals are of the opinion that adding community services to syllabus of secondary schools as part of students’ mandatory tasks will be a useful idea. In my view, both students and societies have the opportunity to utilize the benefits of compulsory community services, although we shouldn’t lose sight of naysayers’ opinions.
Obviously, there are loads of services in societies that have the ability to shift the societies to higher positions. For example, different charities all around a specific country are trying to eliminate poverty and hunger. Students through cooperating in such activities can contribute to relieve the pains of wretched people. Likewise, students who are struggling with teaching to pupils end up to increase the sense of cooperation in the society. Similarly, if students are trained to assist their neighbors as their curriculum in schools, as a result the relation between families will solidify.
Moreover, compulsory unpaid services also have various impacts on students. As a tangible example, helping other people by working in charities make student more confident and positive. In addition, students can enhance their social skills and interaction abilities through instructing younger pupils. Furthermore, they will learn how to be a valuable person in their life and their sights about life values will be widen.
On the other hand, some individuals follow different viewpoints about this idea. In term of education, the hours which students spend on these services may negatively affect on their learning process. Psychologically speaking, seeing such miserable people as homeless ones may lead to mental issues in students. In terms of children’s rights, some people claim that schools don’t have the right to force students for participating in unpaid community services.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on cons and pros this fact, I opt to vigorously support the idea due to merits for both students and societies. Eventually, can we imagine ourselves in place of homeless people and feel their sorrows?
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 89
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 85
- The only way to reduce air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles What is your opinion and explain with your own experiences and examples 80
- the charts below give information on ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 73
- It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated There are many scholars who study locally Is travel really necessary for a better education 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... spend on these services may negatively affect on their learning process. Psychologically...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, for example, in addition, as a result, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51169590643 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91767889044 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5432827485 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.722222222 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172420287352 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05306172261 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049553929205 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952096851865 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354515949706 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... spend on these services may negatively affect on their learning process. Psychologically...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, for example, in addition, as a result, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51169590643 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91767889044 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5432827485 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.722222222 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172420287352 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05306172261 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049553929205 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952096851865 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354515949706 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.