Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue. What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect.
Recently, the phenomenon of "scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that global warming might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the increasing average temperature can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the agricultural standpoint, the increasing average temperature can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the yield of crops and the moderate weather are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of the increasing average temperature in agricultural products. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both protecting plants and the cold temperature distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, the effects of the increasing average temperature might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of climate change. Moreover, fundamental aspects of global warming can relate to the reality that the demerits of greenhouse gas emissions can pertain to fossil fuels. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of melting icebergs were correlated positively with rising sea levels, the local authorities would ultimately address producing electric cars. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of preserving the forests.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the increasing average temperature far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | zhao_kangg | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
| 2020-09-11 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- The map bellow is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in communication and forming relationships Do you agree with this opinion Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea 85
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 89
- The information revolution by modern mass media has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society To what extent do you agree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93525179856 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29200174717 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9113635856 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31492429318 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106011239763 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804628721584 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176859984959 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771916985769 0.0609392437508 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.