Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

It is suggested that teenagers should be involved in unpaid community services as a compulsory part of high school programmes. From my personal perspective, participating in such voluntary works is a good idea as it provides young people with valuable skills.

There are a great variety of benefits when youngsters take part in unpaid community services. To begin with, it enables them to foster their skills. Joining in such activities is much more beneficial than sitting in front of the TV. By doing this, juveniles are capable of improving their organizational skills, problem-solving skills as well as their communicative abilities. In addition, they will have more opportunities to socialize and communicate with other people, form new relationships, broaden their friend cycles, and exchange their thoughts with people who have the same interests.

Moreover, it is a good way for the children to learn to be patient and have higher endurance after working for community service. Specifically, when they teach the children in remote areas to write and read, patience is required, which cannot be learned from textbooks. Additionally, being involved in voluntary works allows the young to de-stress. They can keep their mind off from their studies relating to the academic subjects at school. Thus, they will come up with new useful ideas and will not get bored.

To sum up, I do believe that unpaid community services should be implemented in high school programmes as it plays a key role in the development of the children and brings a wide range of benefits. The administration is more likely to flourish if the children are well-educated.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-06 phannhi1511@ 56 view
2024-11-06 Nhi3132006 56 view
2024-11-06 thuyan187 56 view
2024-11-06 ankhanhvien 56 view
2024-11-06 trangiangtie 73 view
Essays by user dinhdaiviet :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, as well as, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24436090226 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03486859423 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7692192262 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253375624539 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829138124248 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956263892111 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167336432006 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723760146014 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.