Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern era, several individuals believe that the intended building is the most essential aim when it is established than its outlook. Partially, I consent to the same point of view for several reasons which I will elaborate in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, the important part of what the building is looked like might be aimed as a landmark of particular place (country or city) regarding its culture. This way could preserve the national heritage which simbolises the numerous historical events in ancient civilisation. Furthermore, such building probably attracts both domestic and international tourist. In term of its uniqueness (shape and size), this would draw public attention towards the impressive structure. To illustrate, the tallest skyscraper in the world, Burj Khalifa, encourages thousand eyes even the personages.
On the flip side, to consider its function could hinder the high cost of arresting such building. Inasmuch as all of the building parts detailed prioritise effectiveness of its shape, circulation and natural lighting, the amounts of expenditures are probably economised considering regular maintainance. In addition, the buildings apparently resist from any unexpected condition which is precluded by architect prior. The constructive designs of long-term purpose enable next generations to use them over the years. Subsequently, quality of the materials used would be major consideration of well-preserved construction.
To sum up, it seems to me that designing a building concerning on its function rather than visual impression might bring several benefits; achieving cheaper cost and resilient design. This is as long as the building could convince societies attention.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-24 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2017-07-13 | Thao Anh194 | 81 | view |
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as sahara desert or Antrarctica What are the benefits and disadvantages of going there 89
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 67
- Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... in the world, Burj Khalifa, encourages thousand eyes even the personages. On the flip ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of arresting such building. Inasmuch as all of the building parts detailed prioritise effe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, well, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66023166023 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14261048428 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675675675676 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5926974983 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177491545692 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511241213551 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512811245195 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106400953285 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302042811967 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... in the world, Burj Khalifa, encourages thousand eyes even the personages. On the flip ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of arresting such building. Inasmuch as all of the building parts detailed prioritise effe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, well, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66023166023 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14261048428 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675675675676 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5926974983 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177491545692 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511241213551 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512811245195 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106400953285 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302042811967 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.