Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
The ever-increasing global population has put mankind at significant risk of being wiped out at incredible speed by newly discovered contagious diseases. This urges the human race to make revolutionary biomedical advancements in order to protect our subsistence. However, it is debatable whether conducting animal testing should persist. While there are several reasons suggesting that this implementation is false and this should be ceased, I am completely against it.
Firstly, it is undeniable that animals’ rights are violated when they are used in research like the rationale of protesters. Specifically, these creatures do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. In fact, all decisions related to them are made by humans as they can not vocalize their own preferences and choices. To exemplify, a colossal number of white mouse have long been being subject to many unexpected experiences which it is expected to discover new inventions. As a result, animal experimentation should be stopped. Without restraining this action, not only would it pose a threat to animals’ lives, but also to mankind’s.
Secondly, it is true that scientists need a clinical illustration for initial trials so they can check the credibility of product or medicine quality. In particular, animals, one of which is mammals, such as mice or monkeys, are utilized because they are biologically analogous to humans. The researchers argue that if a vaccine works on these animals, it would also have a higher prospect to work on humans. For an instant, before injecting the vaccine COVID on humans, doctors have to exercise on a massive amount of white mice. Should this study be impeded, individuals who are desperately in need could not have an efficient treatment. Worse still, many families shattered due to incurable ailments. For everyone’s sake, that must include animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | stereouniverse | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | dangg_khoa15 | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | @evelyn_2810 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | nguyenanhanhanh | 56 | view |
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that million of people still continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions for this 73
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- Increased world demands for oil and gas have made it necessary to look for these sources of energy in remote untouched natural places Do you think the advantages of locating new sources of energy outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such places 56
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals to medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult Others believe that it as getting easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...ng this implementation. Besides, we can reduces the disadvantages by taking care of tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in fact, in particular, in summary, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45896656535 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16129295611 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656534954407 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5926286153 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5263157895 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1239539695 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362760965225 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241624834488 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704358277221 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292533255207 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.