Some people claim that traditional games had more benefits for children than modern ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The contribution of games in the holistic development of juveniles is gigantic in this high tech era. Presently, customary games are believed to be more lucrative for children than the games of present time by some masses. Here, this essay tend to discord with the given statement and mention some strong points before reaching to a valid conclusion.
There are numerous points to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, unlike traditional games, a wide range of modern games are designed to maximize the creativity, educational and cognitive skills.
Contemporary games such as minecraft, big brain academy played on computer enhance the creativeness and mental skills. Adolescents who play such games have to explore innovative ideas to hit the targets and they are supposed to try out original potential of their brain while finding solutions for the challenging game situations. More noticeably, educational games such as K.B.C, numerical, puzzle not only boost their general knowledge but also sharp their calculating skills which improve their educational performances. In contrast, traditional games may provide physical workout but they are helpless to evolve psychology and critical thinking skills. Needless to say, games of present time are invaluable for the offspring.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, some modern games such as basketball, badminton, cricket provide teenagers a platform to become professional sports players. A teenager, for instance, who is talented can get a chance to make his career at national and international level if he improves his skills in such games at highest level. On the contrary, most of traditional games are not recognized at national or international level, they are merely a source of amusement, having no long term benefit. It is, therefore, clear that today's games are far more advantageous than conventional games. What is more, modern games make teenagers mentally and characteristically prepared for combating high competitiveness of this sophisticated world. In contrast, orthodox games are not meant to do this.
To recapitulate, undeniably, traditional games have their own significance in some manners. However, I still believe that the outcomes generated by modern games are considerably weightier than the old fashioned activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-09 | sandhu harman | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | Justin | 82 | view |
- Some people say that TV advertisements have benefits while others believe the opposite Discuss both views give your own opinion and include examples from your experience 81
- Many people think that too much attention and resources are given to protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree with this statement 45
- Many people spend a lot of time using communication technology What are the reasons for this What is the impact on the relationships with their families and other people 73
- Some people think that young people should be free to choose the career they like while others think that they should think more realistically about their future Discuss both the views and give your opinion 84
- People should work a fixed number of hours per week, and employers should not ask anybody to work more than this. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...ticeably, educational games such as K.B.C, numerical, puzzle not only boost their...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...me are invaluable for the offspring. Further emphasizing on my point of view, some m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55649717514 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10567109531 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5510556065 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.277777778 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264411268536 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869984703743 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562486775374 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147996001492 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478853021484 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.