Some people like doing work by hand. Others prefer using machines. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, technology advancement has resulted in numerous changes in all corners of life, not excluding the changes in the way that people do work. Obviously, technology has step-by-step played an important role in people’s lives, of which some people seem to be depended on machines while others like doing work by hand. Personally, that has been the trend that using machines in work is preferable for it help people save time, increase productivity and protect health.
First and foremost, it is said that the working hours can be decreased as technology and machines become more advanced. In other words, thanks to industrial innovation, machines were invented to help people save time to do other things or to relax. Evidently, in the past, washing clothes could spend about 2 hours and often took more than one person. Nowadays, washing machines has helped people with lower washing hours and only with several simple actions. Obviously, thanks to the invention of machines, working become more simple and easier. Instead of spending 2 hours washing clothes by hand, nowadays you can use washing machines to help you do it, and can relax. Moreover, people can do more things in a day, or spend time for relaxing, entertaining or studying. As a result, machines complete help people balance their live between working and leisure time. In a nutshell, machines are become more and more important in people’s lives for working hours decrease and people’s lives balance.
Secondly, it is a fact that since machines were invented, people can produce goods and services, with lower price and high quality. Yet, some people lay emphasis that replacing workers by machines would cause many complex problems, such as unemployment. Obviously, the more modern machines are, the more qualified workers are. However, in the whole economy, the industrial revolution, in which manufacturing high-tech machines has many benefits, even opposite to the argument. In fact, technology development has created many jobs for people that people were employed to manufacture new machines. Evidently, it is said that nowadays, the number of job in the whole economy is dramatically increased. Moreover, the invention of machines allow people to produce cheaper goods and services and thus lower the price with higher quality. As the result, as cheaper goods, people can have more money to buy other things, so creating more jobs in other sectors. Needless to say, thanks to machines, the efficiency of production is more and more increased for producing high quality products and lowering their price.
Because of technology development and advancement, thanks to which, people’s lives have dramatically changed in the more progressive way, especially in work that using machines become more and more popular and is more preferable than doing by hand for working hour decrease and productivity increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-03 | Hanly15 | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-27 | vuthanhhoa.hvtc | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-26 | vuthanhhoa.hvtc | 73 | view |
| 2015-07-21 | Punjabi96 | 70 | view |
| 2014-01-31 | Yamin Anggriyaman | 60 | view |
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 82
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- “Traditional holidays are getting more and more unpopular among the young generations.”Do you agree or disagree with the statement?OR: what extent do you agree/disagree with the statement? Give specific reasons and examples for your argument so that a 56
- It is right that pop singers are paid more than nurses. How far do you agree or disagree with the above statement? Use specific details and reasons to explain why this statement is needed. 73
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 1615.20841683 152% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3347826087 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77964856138 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463043478261 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0604735993 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.545454545 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227973999221 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743035277575 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651205193842 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180980717594 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798868430506 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.