Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A few folks might rather lunch at food stalls or eateries. Others like home-cooked food and eating meals at home. It is agreed that homemade food is far more-better than food in restaurants. The essay will first look at reasons why people prefer eating in restaurants and then discuss why others like eating at home and handcrafted food.
"Going out to eat at restaurant becomes the easiest, simplest and the quickest alternative" It’s the point of view of some people. People throughout the world are preoccupied with work, school, and other extracurricular activities, so families frequently go out to eat at restaurants. However, just as this concept offers advantages, it also has drawbacks. Firstly, when we eat at restaurant or food stalls, we pay not only for the food, but also for the costs of running that business and service’s expenditures such as water, the building and the employees in addition to the meal. Secondly, another problem found in the regular consumption of street food is the high risk of obesity. That’s why approximately half of the people do not prefer to eat outside while, the other percentage prefer it.
Even so, there are few people who eat out all the time and eating at home has many points in its favor. Firstly, eating at home is much less expensive than eating in a restaurant. Obviously, when we eat at home we do the preparation, cooking and serving of the food ourselves and, therefore, do not need to pay the labor costs of cook, waiter and other restaurant staff. Secondly, eating at home is, of course, better in everything; when families eat at home, they know exactly everything that has been added to their meal and knows the cleanliness of their own kitchen. Moreover, they know if the food was prepared well. By and large, eating at home is how to maintain a good health.
In conclusion, I strongly agree eating at home is better than eating out because we can save our money, we able to increase the affection in families and more secure hygiene when cooking at home then outside.
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 73
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 56
- Innovation is often driven by the pursuit of profit and economic growth However some argue that it should prioritize addressing social and environmental issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not well managed What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the benefit 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A few folks might rather lunch at food s...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e eating at home and handcrafted food. 'Going out to eat at restaurant bec...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while, the other percentage prefer it. Even so, there are few people who eat ou...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...home is how to maintain a good health. In conclusion, I strongly agree eating a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, even so, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84943181818 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77314493641 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5377715567 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4117647059 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471267270215 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169937156096 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978904361756 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313088145896 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104541781192 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.