Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both and give opinion.
Approaches to provision of help are quite a debatable topic. While a certain portion of the population contribute directly to specific areas in need of help, others opt to donate money to organisations operating on national or international scale. Both of these views will be discussed in the following essay before my standpoint is stated.
On one hand, direct support is compelling for various causes. Forefront among these is that it is less reliant on money and thus, more suitable for those who are financially restricted. For instance, in Vietnam, young students, in particular, and people in the low-income bracket, in general, often participate directly in charitable activities, including serving foods to the poor in slums and teaching disadvantaged children in foster facilities. Also, it is often noted that taking part in on-site activities in damaged communities can fill participants with a strong sense of fulfillment and pride. This sensation is often shared by groups of volunteers who go to remote places affected by floods to help rebuild residents’ houses, as they witness not only their efforts manifesting physical results but also the gratitude of the vulnerable towards their selfless actions.
On the other hand, it is understandable that monetary donations to credible organisations is also a good option. To begin with, residents of modern societies tend to have busy schedules, which renders them lacking the time and knowledge required for direct involvement. However, through financial contribution, which is also a meaningful gesture, they can facilitate other better-qualified individuals to do the work. Furthermore, with the help of professional charitable organisations, the reach of well-meaning donations could be extended. To illustrate this, when Haiti is devastated by earthquakes and tsunamis, people from all countries could send help through their donations, especially in the form of money.
Taking both sets of arguments into consideration, I believe that both approaches are legible. Each person should get to choose an approach suitable to their capacity, in terms of time, finance and also knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | youjinnyjinnyhong | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | ammaracca | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | nguyen4562 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | nguyenken91 | 56 | view |
- The flow chart illustrate the consequences of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 87
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table shows the average length of video advertisements on the Internet and the average length of time viewers spend watching them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 64
- n many countries young people are granted certain privileges and responsibilities at the age of sixteen Clearly parents have a responsibility to both care for and prepare their children as they approach this important milestone To what degree should paren 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in general, in particular, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56363636364 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2071659892 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648484848485 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.381720044 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158031834124 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488847957022 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387562652355 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931702935928 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488183062933 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.