Some of people prefer to spend their lifes doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing.
A section of the human race believes that innovations are discomforting, hence they carry out their activities monotonously while another group accepts variety as the spice of life. Each has its reason(s). I will use this essay to discuss both angles and give my opinion which supports change.
To begin with, some people are distressed when new activities and/or skills are introduced, as a result of this they commit every item in their arsenal to fight and resist this change. This attitude is borne of the fact that such reviews bring inefficiencies and makes them appear foolish. It could be argued too that the new ideas distort and disrupt well laid out schedules and plans. Due to the uncertainty novelty brings, it has its downsides, and an example is the inability to predict outcomes, which may cause a great deal of setbacks, which may not be undoable.
On the other hand, there is a class of individuals who believe that new ideas are the ingredient to development. Considering the world around us, it would have been a boring and unattractive community without departure from tradition. This is also what keeps the human race going. Innovations are what brought about the developments and excitement we see around. It brought revolution to how we execute tasks, whether it is education, commerce, travels and interaction. Another instance is change is the adrenaline that drives the human capital; it saves time, effort and energy at achieving greater output. For instance, this innovation of the computer delivered test module, has significantly improved the turnover of results and possibly the candidates as well. On account of this, they devote the time saved to other ventures.
In conclusion, it is my view that change is imperative and desirable. Anyone resisting evolution will not be here if absent. It should be encouraged and supported as it is said always, “change is the only permanence in life”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | veeram34420356 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | aliabshar | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | quynhan1995 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | andrew123 | 61 | view |
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
- There are many different types of music in the world today. why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays ? 89
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 11
- Some of people prefer to spend their lifes doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'resists'.
Suggestion: resists
...nge is imperative and desirable. Anyone resisting evolution will not be here if absent. I...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11006289308 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84815575745 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632075471698 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5549257449 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2777777778 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0724616927032 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0183672610392 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294187741626 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047350188445 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021515779765 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.