Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent times, some individuals condemn that advertisements seemed to manage to convince customers to purchase goods. However, the rest hold the view that advertising are too common for us to care about. From my own perspective, I lean toward the latter opinion.
On the one hand, ads can persuade people to buy things successfully for several justifications, chief of which is the delivery of overall benefits consumers can derive from the products. In fact, lack of knowledge about particular things can be one of the major factors contributing to the ignorance of consumers. By allocating an amount of money for introducing the functions of those products, companies might attract people thanks to their useful features. By way of illustration, customers could not have sufficient awareness of medicines, yet the introduction of types of penicillin that help patients with certain illnesses such as headache, stomachache or respiratory problems might make sense. That is because the advertisements help people interpret the importance of medicines in treating health deterioration. Consequently, more individuals are willing to buy mentioned products, which can improve the businesses' income dramatically.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that with the breakthrough of advertisements, people can not remember all the similar ads to buy products. As a matter of fact, almost every advertisements have a common motif. They often start by the problem that consumers often face up with and then the introduction of the goods to mitigate that issues. However, advertising without creativity might easily be ignored due to their popularity. Take the example of advertisements about noodles in Vietnam, as every brands of noodles are quite similar to others, customers might not pay attention to the difference between those types of goods. Therefore, some noodles companies might fail to gain financial benefits from advertising. In other words, advertising of products that have gained widespread popularity among the community might have no impact on the buyers' decisions.
In conclusion, while it is undeniable that advertisements can persuade us to purchase things to some extent, I strongly hold the view that the fast-paced development of ads will not influence considerably on consumers by their similarity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | LauraTing | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to meet this demand 67
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Parents usually mothers stay at home to look after their families People believe that for this they should receive a salary from the government Do you agree or disagree and why 78
- In some countries the number of people choosing to live by themselves is increasing rapidly in recent years Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 913, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'businesses'' or 'business's'?
Suggestion: businesses'; business's
...ntioned products, which can improve the businesses income dramatically. On the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50140056022 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20938978908 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3340349206 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.529411765 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238809767692 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722707831156 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462426074973 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147919172982 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215167705468 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.