The argument whether the amount of time children spend in watching TV affects their behavior most or what they watch really matters is stilled not settled yet. This argument merit serious consideration and I will explain why with pertinent argument and examples. Ultimately, I think there is nothing wrong in spending more time in watching TV. But the content of what is been watch should always be put into consideration.
However, there are myriad of argument in favor of my stance. The most conspicuous one is the advantages associated with watching academic program. Nowadays, the mode of teaching young children is through TV design program which has positive effect on them. Although watching some of this program can be time consuming but the benefit of becoming intelligent should be consider. Children can also learn about the entire human body before they get to high school through anatomy and physiology design TV program for kids. Children can also watch healthy eating habit program that can help them make better choice when it comes to eating time and avoid junk foods that can lead to obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure in future.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that children practice and behave in line with what they see and what they watch. Henceforth, the importance of monitoring their TV viewing should always be consider because a child who constantly watch a movie where people are always fighting will want to experiment it with his peers at school. And if not properly monitor and discipline can be detrimental and lead bully of other children. Two months ago TV media reported a ten year old boy killing his father in America with a gun own by the father. Where did he learnt how to use gun? Obviously from what he has been seeing from movies. Prior to this, it is equally important that parent monitor what their children are watching. Because research has proof that ninety percent of children spent nothing less that thirty hours a week watching TV.
I think that children should be allotted specific hours for academic TV programs. knowing that TV can cause distraction at times. Because too much of everything is bad. And parent are advice to put privacy code on all TV, ipad, tablet and computers so that they can monitor the usage of their children Tv watching to avoid bad behaviors.
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 67
- the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small community 73
- Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. They should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Studying the English language in an English-speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'merits'.
Suggestion: merits
... stilled not settled yet. This argument merit serious consideration and I will explai...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...nefit of becoming intelligent should be consider. Children can also learn about the enti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol through anatomy and physiology design TV program for kids. Children can also w...
^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
...rough anatomy and physiology design TV program for kids. Children can also watch healt...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oid junk foods that can lead to obesity, diabetes and high blood pressure in futu...
^^
Line 2, column 724, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...sity, diabetes and high blood pressure in future. Another pivotal aspect of my argumen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'be' and 'consider'.
Suggestion: be always consider
...e of monitoring their TV viewing should always be consider because a child who constantly watch a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: DID_PAST[2]
Message: Did you mean 'learn'?
Suggestion: learn
...h a gun own by the father. Where did he learnt how to use gun? Obviously from what he ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Knowing
...pecific hours for academic TV programs. knowing that TV can cause distraction at times....
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...that TV can cause distraction at times. Because too much of everything is bad. And pare...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, so, still, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90680100756 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45638825209 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564231738035 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7749300528 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279458015368 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817134630062 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804059151861 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181039634664 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706817789218 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.