Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In a few recent years, the advantages and disadvantages of economic development have become a considerable controversy in public. Some people think that the improvement of the economy is the only method to address the problems of hunger and poverty, others argue that economic growth should be prevented because of its environmental crisis. I totally agree with the latter opinion.
There is an argument that the development of the economy is a sole cure for hungry and poverty situations. A reason which is put forward the view is that the economy growing can make significant contributions to an increase in the income of all citizens, especially a number of poor persons in developing countries. In fact, a nation with economic growth will have a higher level of gross domestic products which are allocated to all citizens of the country in various ways. It means that the more the economy goes up, the more the income as well as living standards of the citizens will increase. As a result, they would gradually escape from poverty and the lack of food.
In comparison, several individuals believe that there should be actions to stop the rise of the economy since it is causing a lot of negative impacts on the environment. Take the operation of factories in the industrial sector for example. A great deal of carbon dioxide which is the result of the burning a huge amount of fossil fuel in industrial activities is main factor leading many environmental problems such as rising sea level, global warming and greenhouse effect. In addition, agricultural production should carry a good part of the blame for the deterioration of ecosystems. For example, to generate a huge yield of produce, many farmers have used a large number of chemical substances, especially chemical fertilizer and pesticides. Consequently, these plant protection substances would result in the pollutions of land and water, even serious aftereffects on habitats in which humans and animals live. Therefore, many solutions need to be carried out in order to put economic development in control.
In conclusion, some people share the view that economic improvement is the only way to eliminate the problems of hunger and poverty. However, I agree with others’ opinion that the growth of the economy should be put in the end since it has adverse effects on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- in the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 87
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ield of produce, many farmers have used a large number of chemical substances, especially chemica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07989690722 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95046588927 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528350515464 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.010684816 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.941176471 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189892987734 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595777962491 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892916916809 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162189787461 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126562903316 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.