some people say that it's better to teach language students in small
classes, whereas others think the number of people does not matter.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
It is important to teach languages in any education system. Although some persons argue that language classes ought to include a few numbers of students, others believe that the number of students is not important. I, personally, support the former view. This essay will discuss both perspectives and I will explain why I believe that small classes are better.
On the one hand, some people, as well as I, recommend limiting the number of students in language classes. This is because the pupils' concentration would be better which makes the class more efficient. Therefore, they would be able to obtain more information and have better communication with their classmates and teachers. For examples, in a study conducted in the USA, when the class contained less than 20 students, their control of language was far better than those in classes with more students. If the students are not able to concentrate, they may give up and hate the language. Thus, I believe that small classes will help the students pay more attention and will be able to excel in learning the language.
On the other hand, another group advocates that the number of students does not impact the efficiency because language teaching depends mainly on rote learning and after-class practice. Students should study at home to memorize vocabulary by heart as well as study the grammar by solving exercises. Moreover, they are required to communicate with their classmates or people who have good conduct of the language for better conversation. Of course, even in small classes, if the students did not practise the language outside the school setting, their progress would be slower than their peers who did. In this respect, school is only to teach students the language content but not the perfect place to practise the language.
In conclusion, although some people believe that it is not necessary to teach language in small classes because the practice outside school premises is more crucial to develop their language, I still think that small classes are important to teach language skills as it provides better concentration and teachers can help students overcome their weaknesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-16 | Zheng Lihao | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-21 | Zheng Lihao | 79 | view |
- nonemployment is getting increasingly serious in many countries. Some people think students only need to get primary education, while others think secondary education is necessary. What 's Your opinion? 100
- some people say that it s better to teach language students in small classes whereas others think the number of people does not matter Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 81
- Multicultural societies, in which there is a mixture of different ethnicpeoples, bring more benefits than drawbacks of a country. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent. 67
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...n language classes. This is because the pupils concentration would be better which mak...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elp students overcome their weaknesses.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, of course, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18130311615 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67066852442 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490084985836 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2237935521 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232691013867 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807663492892 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055473894908 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161375006747 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358486297558 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.