Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different culture and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, more and more people listen to different types of music. Some individuals believe that music could gather listeners from various cultures, countries, and ages together. In my opinion, I agree with this aforementioned statement to a large extent; however, universal music my damage the local music.
On the one hand, music these days succeeded in bringing folks all around the world together. This is highly due to the fact that because of the advanced technology that led to the globalization, no everyone could access and listen to any type of music anywhere anytime. For example, now if there is a concert for specific kind of music, there would be audiences from different backgrounds but they share the same interest which is listening to that music. Therefore, it is believed that music could do something that other developments could not do which is gathering people together.
On the other hand, even though this is a great phenomenon; yet, the local music in each nation is being lost. Also, because of the easily access to music all over the world, many people, especially the young ones, are no longer interested in their domestic music, resulting in losing their heritage. For instance, a recent study in Iraq showed that only 15% of their searching online process is for the Iraqi music instead, 85% of them are searching for foreign music. Consequently, now only the trending music is being popular and local one or no longer interesting for many.
In conclusion, for some people music has the magic for bringing different listeners together despite of their ages or cultural backgrounds. In my opinion, although I agree with this view largely, this development would harm the local music.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06690140845 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65559962778 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1287540688 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234625172464 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955877123594 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784875510969 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174967666429 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077293456785 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.