Some people say that TV advertisements have benefits, while others believe the opposite. Discuss both views, give your own opinion and include examples from your experience.
Advertisements play a vital role in selling of products. One of the most controversial issues today relates to that, television endorsement; either have more merits or demerits? In the further piece of essay, I am going to explore all the dimensions of the given topic through some examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
The first step to understand that, why some people think that television have more pessimistic impacts? Broadly speaking, the prominent reason is fake products. There are many products which have fascinating designs as shown in the advertisements but when they are bought they are extremely dull. For instance, in a recent survey of advertising companies it was illustrated that, 60% of the people believe that products are neither similar nor work properly to the product shown in television broadcast. In addition, another reason for believing this is pressure. There are many advertisements on television which attracts many children easily and they become stubborn to buy these products which build up a pressure on parents. Similarly, these types of broadcast also manipulate people so badly and become an reason for negative impact.
However, there are some people who think that these commercial adds on television have more optimistic impact. Why do they think so? The foremost reason popularity. They say that, commercial adds make the products well known and increases its selling. People often buy products which are in trend and mostly recommended by others. Moreover, the second fundamental reason is that, advertisements provides information about plethora of products which gives us right to choose the best product. For example, cornflakes have a variety of flavours for different ranges to offer for different age groups and now also for people want to lose weight, hence it provides several choices to select from.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that, both the aspects are convincing and advertising is significant as well but there are some steps that should be taken by government and they should make stringent laws against the companies which provide fake products and must ban products which manipulate children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-12 | sheetal | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-02 | binita karki | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
- It is said that adulterated food is key reason Behind deteriorated health of all age group masses How far you agree or disagree with it 85
- Some people believe companies should pay for the damage the cause to the environment while other say that government should be responsible for such expenses Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 44
- Some business observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to like interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues What could be reason for this What solution can help address this problem 54
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem? 73
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Some think this is good while other believer this is a problem for a country Discuss both views and give your opinion 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...o manipulate people so badly and become an reason for negative impact. However,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29597701149 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81988221354 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.252735383 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.388888889 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13551916477 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427977086874 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278865190006 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867697532129 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104636500723 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.