The increased incidence of traffic accidents has been a certain catastrophe for many countries, costing an enormous amount of money and effort to eliminate. Although increasing minimum age for driving cars or riding motorbikes might be necessary, I am not convinced that it is the optimum solution to tackle this issue.
Firstly, traffic infrastructure, namely road condition, traffic signal management and control systems should principally account for road safety. In all likelihood, a multi-lane road with appropriately arranged signing systems will be less perilous for drivers and pedestrians. Secondly, public transit is proved to be safer than driving due to its prioritized transportation systems and rigorously trained drivers. Therefore, upgrading public transport such as metro or bus systems is among crucial solutions to improve road safety.
On the other hand, the endeavor of eradicating road traffic injuries might turn to be futile if people’s consciousness of traffic rules is inadequate. It is true that the possibility of accidents is also regarded to driving skills and awareness, not merely aging matters. Therefore, early education to improve the knowledge, insight and attitudes towards safe traffic participation is utterly essential for every citizen. In addition, strict traffic rules and penalties might play an integral part of effective traffic systems because people will be more cautious about being sentenced by driving carelessly.
General speaking, minimizing legal age for traffic participants is probably a practical sentiment but should not be considered as the best solution to reduce traffic accidents and increase road safety. Other elements such as traffic infrastructures and people’s respect for the law are more critical factors forming safe transportation systems.
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of 92
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- Countries（where there is high unemployment）most pupils should be offered only primary education, there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83582089552 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12037583916 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630597014925 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5460541634 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178303961952 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714631400014 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408958274179 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120525630014 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280251176656 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.