Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Some believe that there are types of old buildings are derserved to be conserved while others are not. This essay will explain why buildings possessing both architecteral and practical values should be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the drawbacks.
There are buildings erected with unique designs which contribute to the facade of certain neighborhood. This not only makes up the aesthetic cityscape but also attracts visitors, generates more income for local inhabitants. Additionally, some buldings are still playing important role in accommodating people are worth budget for preservation. The expediture to maintain such buildings are often lower than the cost of demolition and construct new ones that justifies the conservation of them.
One the one hand, there are ancient buildings that are synonymus with local history and culture. These buildings can be utilized as exhibitions sites of past events and relics of particular regions, creating tourist attractions. The more visitors come to the spots the more income are generated to compensate for their existence. On the other hand, many buildings constructed in the past are unable to withstand the test of time. High maintenance and management cost rendering sustaining those building are futile. Constructions of new buildings with up-to-date designs, and state-of-the-art technologies are more worthwhile than squandering on preservation of the buildings.
In sum, architecture and application are two important factors should be taken into account to consider certain building are worth remaining or not. I concur with the view the downsides of keeping old buildings eclipses the merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- Many people think that women should have given the same roles to male in military and police forces Many people think that women are not suitable for this job Discuss both views and give opinions 78
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on environmental pollution and housing problems To some extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ould be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the draw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6484375 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11431767958 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8492812616 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406071530268 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125113098337 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672303782389 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232606274958 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562633017042 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.