Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Some believe that there are types of old buildings deserve to be conserved while others are not. This essay will explain why buildings possessing both architecteral and practical values should be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the drawbacks.
Premises embellish local landscape and function efficiently should be of the prime priority. There are buildings erected with unique designs which contribute to the facade of certain neighborhoods. This not only makes up the aesthetic cityscape but also attracts visitors, generates more income for local inhabitants. Additionally, some buildings are still playing an important role in accommodating people are worth the budget for preservation. One case in point is the Vietnamese opera house, which is currently being harnessed to house musical event audience. The expenditure to maintain such buildings is often lower than the cost of demolition and reconstruction that justifies the conservation of them.
Retaining old buildings is not beneficial. One the one hand, there are ancient buildings that are synonymous with local history and culture. These buildings can be utilized as exhibition sites of past events and relics of particular regions, which remind denizens of their historical and culteral heritage. Another reason for conserving old constructions is that a plethora of them can be renovated and reused. This alleviates unnecessary burdens on the local environtment while constring new buildings. On the other hand, many buildings constructed in the past are unable to withstand the test of time. High maintenance and management cost render sustaining those building are futile. Constructions of new buildings with up-to-date designs, and state-of-the-art technologies are more worthwhile than squandering on preservation of the old buildings. Likewise, as structure of time-worn buiding have deteriorated over time, putting them into use become increasingly dangerous for people.
In sum, architecture and application are two important factors should be taken into account to consider certain building are worth preservation or not. I concur with the view the downsides of keeping old buildings eclipse the merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same Some people consider this to be a positive development while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that the best way to become successful in life is to get a university education whereas others say this is no longer true Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the best way to become successful in life is to get a university education whereas others say this is no longer true Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...ould be remained, and the merits of old buildings protection are overshadowed by the draw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72205438066 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16922893013 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5182115007 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6842105263 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42772714093 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126243345179 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858808908392 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269867817802 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464103993495 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.