Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international orginizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion
People have different view on what kind of support should wealthy countries provide for thrid world countries. Some believe that support in form of finance are more beneficial while others do not. In my opinion, practical aid and advice apppears to be more effective and efficient.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people believe that financial support are what developing countries need. Firstly, external monetary flow enables government to deploy various public development projects such as infrastructure upgrading, social healthcare system and power supplies. This, in return, helps avoid stagnation, foster economic progress and boost citizen’s living standard. Secondly, the injection of foreign capital enables less developed countries to maintain an effective and transparent govermental administrative system by paying the officials satisfied salaries. With stable income, governmental personnels would be motivated and devoted themselves into resolving social issues, thus lifting the community out of crimes and social chaos.
On the other hand, I believe that other forms of support such as practical advice are of equivalent importance. Sustainable growth depends not only on money, but also on how a country is governed, particularly in resolving internal issues such as crimes, poverty and unemployment. In this regards, certainly developing countries are not experienced enough, which emphasizes the necessity of consultancy of international organizations. Furthermore, it is the intellectuals, which can only be systematically and professsionally trained, that drive and maintain the development of the society. As a result, prodiving advices for less developed countries will help them be self-reliant and gradually, they will be able to turn themselves in to a financially independent country.
In conclusion, though financial assistance has its own merits, practical aid and advice offers a long-term solution to alleviate poverty faced by majority of developing countries and it should be the focal priority of the internationl organization
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | prathamesh27 | 61 | view |
| 2017-04-03 | sandrock | 89 | view |
- Some people are born to be leaders others believe that leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
- Topic: It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 66
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? What measures? 86
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- Involvement of youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate. Throw some light on the causes and possible solutions? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...as crimes, poverty and unemployment. In this regards, certainly developing countries...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91089108911 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28183929011 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627062706271 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0090693809 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.928571429 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243264431808 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805656618259 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545400848147 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14357091005 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240123435112 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.