Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people assume that it is unnecessary for employers to comment on how their employees dress in the workplace since work quality is what should be prioritized. In my opinion, I totally support this statement as what employers should pay attention to is not an insignificant matter such as employees’ clothes as they need to consider better work condition and workforce competence main priorities.
To begin with, when employers are too critical of how their workers dress to work, employees somehow cannot produce the desired productivity since they only care about dressing to please the bosses’ eyes instead. Thus, whenever they meet their bosses, they will always adjust their clothes or hair first to suit the employers’ preferences to not be criticized because of unprofessional appearances. This means that the quality of work is underestimated since workers only care about dressing to please bosses instead of focusing on working effectively, which can directly affect work quality. For instance, an employee’s work outcomes can be affected when they only focus on wearing professionally to the bosses’ preferences instead of finding ways to progress at work.
Moreover, instead of employees’ fashion choices, what employers should be concerned about are work environment and employees’ work competence instead. These factors are decisive to a better work productivity and work outcomes. When working in a friendly environment where employees and bosses cooperate to learn and progress, the quality of work can be improved significantly. For instance, friendly environment can create motivation for employees to increase productivity at work since they are not pressured by conflicts or competitions at work. Furthermore, employers should be paying attention to their employees’ abilities at work. Even if their employees are well-dressed but incompetent for the occupation, their contributions prove futile for the development of a business. For example, when it comes to dealing with an unexpected problem at work, but the well-dressed workers are incapable of tackling it, they are likely to destroy a whole community’s productivity.
In conclusion, I believe that employees’ ways of dressing is not what employers should take into consideration. However, they should be attentive to establish a friendly workplace and employ competent people to improve work productivity to strengthen their business.
- The diagrams show changes to a medical centre from 2008 to 2010 73
- The chart below compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in wh 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65122615804 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23367928047 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490463215259 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6680208118 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.266666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37857047577 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157917759803 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780167663245 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27907154058 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499025869999 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.