Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country to what extent do you agree of disagree.
International tourism has become more popular in the present time because it helps in many ways to the economy. While many people believe that visitors should be charging more money than citizens when they visit historical places in a nation, others do not think it would be not a good idea. This essay will discuss why people think charging more money than local ones is beneficial and why I disagree with the argument.
Nowadays many people like to visit other countries spending a good time with their families. If the government starts to charge more money from international travelers than local citizens at historical and cultural places, it will help develop the place. Foreigners not tax-payer of the country, whereas local people pay taxes regularly. Bhutan, for example, charged more money from visitors as compared to local citizens it ticket prices of temples. Since taking these steps by the ruler party, more money will come for improvements in many areas of a country. Therefore, it is a sign for people who wants to charge more money from tourists because it will bring more money for improvements.
However, it would not be a good reason for making extra money than local ones because it creates many drawbacks in the tourism business. Firstly, tourism more depend on foreign people than citizens, while they found about these charging patterns maybe they will not come to a visit, which leads to a big disaster for local shops, transportation, and the whole tourism business. India, for instance, provides the same prices at the Taj Mahal in Delhi for local and international travelers, which is a reason for their success at global levels. Indeed, it would not be a good idea to making more money from international people, when they visit ancient places.
To conclude, International tourism becomes more popular than ever before. Although if local authorities start to take more money from visitors than citizens, it creates bad images and an obstacle for local businesses in a particular country. In my words, despite having the same amount of charges at historical places for both local and foreign people. It will create more positive impacts on the economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-08 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 84
- The maps shows changes in frenton city during 1992 to 2012 11
- Charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006 73
- The bar chart shows men s and women s prize money at golf majors in 2010 90
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones their advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tickets'?
Suggestion: tickets
...sitors as compared to local citizens it ticket prices of temples. Since taking these s...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore positive impacts on the economy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06906077348 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56994133308 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8463028076 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330667869663 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121619307608 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881036252823 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236743180542 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816971015779 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.