For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the development of schoolchildren is becoming more debatable. While their teachers play a major role in their intelligence and social development than parents, I disagree with it. In this essay, I will explain both views of the view and why I disagree with it.
To comments, when children are in schools, they will learn about many things in terms of subjects from their teachers. This may lead them to find their interests for future developments, resulting in they will become more aware of their potential for a particular field. A survey, for example, by the University of Yale showed that 89% of students on their campus found their favorable fields from the guidance of faculty. Hence, the more they spend time with teachers, the more they become more independent and they near to finding their passions.
On the other hand, others and I think that parents play a role in social and intellectual developments in children because children spend their much time at home before starting their schooling. Since they learn about various things such as numbers and alphabets to manners from their father and mother. This may result in helping them to cope with many difficulties when they start to attend their schools. For instance, research has shown that they have a higher chance to succeed in their later years since participants learn basic things in mathematics from their parents. Therefore, the more they learn from their parents, the more they become successful.
In conclusion, although pupils learn about their passions from teachers, which will benefit them, they become more aware of basic things and manners from their parents because they spend more time with parents before attending school. In my words, Despite having many benefits for students from teachers, learning from parents has more positives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by di erent sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 73
- The maps 11
- The chart show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18120805369 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55189814371 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1890650432 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36645451386 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159418913775 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869844921119 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261606022032 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481749735823 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.