Some people think goverments should spend mowney on measures to save languages with few speaker form duying out completely. Others think that this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss these both views and give your opinion?
It is obviously true that minority languages are gradually dissapeared while the domination of global languages are rapidly flourishing in recent years. Although it can be argued that governments could save the budgets by allowing to this happen, I strongly believe that these languages should be preserved and protected.
There are several reasons why humans are not in favor of governments investing more money in local language preservation. To begin with, this will be needed to make sure people learn minority languages through expensive educational programs if it is spoken by a small group of people, then the state will be spent more money on facilities, teachers, and marketing rather than allocating funds to more crucial sectors. Moreover, it would be much better and more efficient if people speak the same languages to eradicate the misunderstanding among conversations. For example, if foreign people do not have translators beside themselves, then they could be failed to understand the flow of information wanted to deliver as they cannot comprehend completely.
On the other hand, governments should preserve endangered languages as it is a foundation of culture. There is no denying that language and culture are interrelated, thereby losing a language as well as being on verge of extinction of culture. In addition, language holds significant historical values which help the younger generation to connect with their ancestors. For instance, ancient documents cannot be extracted as they are written by forgotten words, therefore, threatened languages should be saved to conserve the connection between precious and modern people.
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term, this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-22 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
- Overfishing is a serious global problem that threatens ocean wildlife and biodiversity Loss of marine life brings a further threat to the millions of people who rely on seafood for protein and livelihoods 84
- Some people think healthcare should be free for everyone others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves Discuss both view and give your own opinion 67
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 84
- The rise of cyberbullying What are the causes of this problem and the steps that schools can use to prevent it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43205574913 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00470883791 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9589042009 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.727272727 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2727272727 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133129539653 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564963762333 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255159848224 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855406686835 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239377845624 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.