Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture,
others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The use of the government funding has been a prolonged discussion with contrasting viewpoints.
Some argue that governmental funds should not be used for art and cultural activities while others
believe that supporting art and culture is beneficial. This essay will discuss both views but agrees that
financing art and culture is advantageous.
Some people consider it is unfair and unnecessary to sponsor art and cultural practices. they believe
that while there are more burning social issues such as poverty, unemployment, homelessness etc.
that require financial support, governmental budget should not be wasted for recreational purposes.
However, art and cultural programs can bring about economic values by attracting local and
international tourists, which, in truth, can be helpful in solving social problems. For example, the
Carnival in Rio de Janeiro, an annual festival promoting Brazilian culture, injects billions of dollars into
Brazil’s economy every year thanks to tourism.
On the other hand, there are people in favor of the government’s expenditure on art and culture due to
the great benefits they bring. The first benefit is that art and cultural activities preserve a country’s
unique culture. For instance, water puppet festivals in Vietnam have helped conserve the distinct
Vietnamese arts since the 11th century. Moreover, art and cultural activities have proven advantages
in contributing to the people’s overall well-being. Particularly, the Danish governmental spending on
cultural activities is high. Accordingly, these activities, such as Skagen Winter Swimming festival and
Roskilde festival – the largest music and culture festival in denmark and in Northern Europe; are
greatly promoted and become the key factor in making denmark one of the top 3 happiest nations in
the world.
In summary, although there are people opposed to government spending on art and culture programs,
it is necessary for the authorities to continue funding them due to their undeniable benefits.
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some believe that lot of scientific research is a waste of time and money. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people think scientific research is a waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The chart below show the percentage of of five kinds of book sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... to sponsor art and cultural practices. they believe that while there are more burn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84590163934 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05793560581 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616393442623 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3447487783 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340712552797 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115824304246 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842024715323 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929735425717 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772893847124 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.