Some people think the government should spend money to look for life on other planets, others think it is a waste of public money, because there are other problems unsolved on earth. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. (Government).
People have different views about whether the government should invest money in exploring a new life in space or use public money to deal with their problems on the Earth. Personally, I believe that it is a waste to use the money for discovering space.
On the one hand, investing more money to deal with the civilizations problem would really benefit people's lives. The difficulties in daily life would be directly tackled, therefore, make life be much easier. If there are no more huge obstacles, people will be able to develop rapidly which means they could make more money to enhance their life quality. For example, the Vietnamese government has a policy that supports money to people who suffer from the COVID-19 pandemic, so as to remain stable while they could not go to work. This policy diminishes people’s anxiety, giving them a strong spiritual belief to quickly recover and get back to work.
On the other hand, exploring life on other planets has no advantages for mankind. While the earth is still not completely discovered, exploring space would let people miss many places on this planet. Even if people can find a new planet that is available to live on, the process to build the infrastructures and move people from the earth to that planet will also take a huge amount of revenue. However, the problem is not that people do not have enough space to live on the Earth but their actions. As long as people do not change their ways of using the planet's resources, which is wasteful and unorganized, getting to a new place would change nothing, but more planets be destroyed
.
In conclusion, I would argue that the government should take money into addressing the earth's issues instead of wasting money for finding a new planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-28 | perry1812 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products which is good for the economy While others believe it is bad for society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Medical services should be run by profit making companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it however others prefer to give money to national or private charities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job or shortage money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'civilizations'' or 'civilization's'?
Suggestion: civilizations'; civilization's
..., investing more money to deal with the civilizations problem would really benefit peoples li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... who suffer from the COVID-19 pandemic, so as to remain stable while they could not go t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... nothing, but more planets be destroyed . In conclusion, I would argue that the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84053156146 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5385346464 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531561461794 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3433568921 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.076923077 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311454240792 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118320634253 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078114314663 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210726758385 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479136809701 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.