Some people think the government should spend money to look for life on other planets, others think it is a waste of public money, because there are other problems unsolved on earth.
Discuss both view and give your own opinion .
While some people want governments to allocate funds to find life on other planets, others argue that there are more important problems of the society such as extreme poverty, abysmal health care, poor infrastructure that needs to be addressed. I agree with the latter view.
Throughout times, the human race has been eager to prove search for the existence of extra-terrestrial life. This is primarily due to the fact that human activities such as illegal dumping of wastes into bodies of water water bodies and illegal extensive (large-scale) logging have been continuously depleting the natural resources of our planet. Hence, some scientists feel the need to find a possible planet that has the potential to cater for life. Moreover, many products developed for space exploration have been used for the benefit of humans on the earth. The technology used for carrying satellites and humans to space is being used to keep our homes insulated from extreme cold and heat. Also, this space technology is being used to test various medicines that are later consumed by humans to cure various diseases.
Nonetheless, some argue I support the view that it is just a waste of financial resources. This is mainly because, despite several space programs for the past 50 years, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has failed to prove the existence of other life forms in the outer space, and there are other serious problems on earth that need immediate attention. For example, although Russians contributed immensely to the exploration of the moon, the Russians they have still been suffering from poverty. A study conducted by the World Bank in 2017 found out that nearly 20 million of them are surviving on wages which are below the poverty threshold. Instead of spending a vast amount of money for space exploration, governments can allocate the budget into addressing to address poverty through by generating jobs for the people or increasing their minimum wages.
To conclude, I agree that the pursuit of humans to prove life outside our planet is a total waste of finances. Governments should firstly prioritize people’s welfare by addressing economic and financial problems such as hunger and poverty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-28 | perry1812 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | Khanhu010101 | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is widely believed that children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together while others thin that more intelligent children should be taught separately Discuss and present your own opinion 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think is it happening How to solve this issue 78
- Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it however others prefer to give money to the national or private charities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: water
...llegal dumping of wastes into bodies of water water bodies and illegal extensive large-scal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74565313015 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7351527379 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230652478684 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708810427743 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054867360457 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149005127755 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492734662192 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.