Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities such as the environment Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Due to globalisation, transport system has been increased day by day which creates ease for people to transport. Some people argued that authorities should be impart financial support to the transport network, I agree with those who consider to spend money on solve environmental issues especially protection of environment. In this essay I will Discuss both views with a relevant examples.

On the one hand, if government allocate some fund in public transport system so it indirectly affect the economy of cities or nation. What I mean that the demand of public transport may be increased which reduce the number of private vehicles and the people give a priority to travel by public transport and give a money to travel Which increase the financial position of a nation. Also it may bring a huge change in traffic problem. For example Japan innovated maglev train which is a much faster than other vehicle, so 75% of Japanese use it on daily basis and keep their car at home which reduce the traffic on road.

On the other hand, administry of a nation should spend expenditure to improvise environment problems which reached very far. Government provide subsidies to renewable energy research field which may encourages them to find a new one. Moreover, government should provide funding towards garbage picker and water purifiers who clean the drainage and sewage and makes world pollution free. Also government should support to scientist for innovates new ways to tackle a problem.For example, US government provided 20% of the budget amount to botanical Garden and its scientist to find a new way to increase the plantation which produced oxygen and clean the air.

All in all, I believe that environmental crisis has the most hazardous problem so government should allocate some fund to reduce environmental problems instead of spending on a transport service.

Votes
Average: 10 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imparted'?
Suggestion: imparted
...eople argued that authorities should be impart financial support to the transport netw...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider spending'.
Suggestion: consider spending
...ansport network, I agree with those who consider to spend money on solve environmental issues esp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'example'?
Suggestion: example
...will Discuss both views with a relevant examples. On the one hand, if government allo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...ublic transport system so it indirectly affect the economy of cities or nation. What I...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
... to travel by public transport and give a money to travel Which increase the financial ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ase the financial position of a nation. Also it may bring a huge change in traffic p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...e Japan innovated maglev train which is a much faster than other vehicle, so 75% of Ja...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... sewage and makes world pollution free. Also government should support to scientist ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... innovates new ways to tackle a problem.For example, US government provided 20% of ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, for example, i mean, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13725490196 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78479697546 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8160314817 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263847124554 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892257995634 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574393282554 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15096653034 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390402710565 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.