Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is true that there are conflicting views about the benefits of hosting major international sports events. While some argue that such events are advantageous for the host nation, some people believe that they are a waste of money that could be better spent. I will elaborate on both sides and give my opinion in this essay.
On the one hand, advocates of hosting international sports events focus on the stimulus which they give to promoting health and economic prosperity. The fans and the public normally search for information about the destination on the internet as well as give reviews about their experience during the sports events. Eventually, the host country usually raise the profile of the country. Moreover, after the games, the country can get the chance to be a tourist attraction, which becomes a source of money for the government. In terms of the economy, hospitality and tourism benefit from the influx of sports fans from all over the world. An event such as the Olympic Games, for example, provides a kind of shop window for the host nation to advertise its attractions for tourists. Finally, because of the development of tourist business, there are more job opportunities for local residents, which contributes to the wealth of a nation.
However, there are some negative outcomes that need further consideration. First and foremost is the government budget. Obviously, holding a global event costs a huge amount of money. if the government of the host nation provides funding for these events, then it must curb public spending on hospitals, schools and a welfare state to help the poor. Therefore, poor countries and developing countries should not try to be the host country of these events, instead, they need to spend their budget on other important sectors such as public healthcare, education, and social insurance. Another thing that should be considered is environmental pollution. There are many pictures of tons of trash at the stadiums after the games, which is very common after the games. With the rapid increase in the tourist industry, the environment will highly be in danger in the future because of irresponsible acts of the visitors.
In conclusion, being a host country for an international sports game not only becomes a source of money for the government but also strengthens the economy. However, governments should also consider their budgets as well as the environmental issues before putting huge efforts into holding these events.
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 73
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity, not in quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 89
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...bal event costs a huge amount of money. if the government of the host nation provi...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f irresponsible acts of the visitors. In conclusion, being a host country for ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, another thing, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15763546798 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7822396697 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.387390528 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251125783303 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688885763594 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676137189511 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16995082708 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871312629967 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.