Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The climate has always been changed since we have records: the Earth experienced glacial eras and dry periods, but the global warming we are assisting today is something different, because it has happened in an incredible short leight of time. This anthropogenic warming must be stopped, and I totally disagree with those who propose to adapt our way of life to it.
To start with, a significant part of the planet is seriously endangered by the raising of the temperatures, and the population living there can not simply become more flexible because those place will not be able to sustain the human life. For instance, many islands in the South East Asia could disappear under the sea, because the oceans level is increasing due to the melting of the polar ice. Moreover, the hotter temperatures cause longer period of drought causing the death of entire ecosystems and, ultimately, the desertification. It is clear that the change of the climate is dramatic and can seriously harm the life of the people, the plant and the animals.
Speaking about animals, the greenhouse effect is a serious threat for the conservation of thousands of species around the globe, especially those who live in the colder areas. If the humanity will not act in the next years animals such as the polar bear, the penguins and the seals will live only in captivity because the losing of their habitats. Those devastating effects are destined to spread even outside the polar circles: the scientists reported how tropical fish such as the barracuda are now able to live in relatively cold environments, as the north Mediterranean sea, endangering the local species and, ultimately, the food chain.
To summarize, the climate change is a serious and real emergency and the humankind should pose a serious set of strategies to cope with it, instead thinking about adaptation, because the long-term consequences are unfixable and can be a risk for the survival of many animal species, including the human itself.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-20 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 56 | view |
2019-11-20 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 56 | view |
2019-11-20 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 61 | view |
2019-11-05 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight. This is a serious problem for wealthy countries.Discuss some causes and effects of this problem. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experi 89
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 73
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 73
- What are your reasons for applying to this program
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for instance, speaking about, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05740181269 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77613751697 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595166163142 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.095391542 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.4 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107774002349 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400825589385 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321781973281 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691809632535 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310857872037 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.