Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that the main interest is in the world of business. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some individuals contend that the chief benefit of international cooperation is environmental protection, others argue that its main advantage is to boost the global economy. Although both viewpoints have significant merits, I believe environmental protection and trade values are equally important in determining the fundamental roles of such cooperation.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons for the former perspective that cooperation among nations can be advantageous in addressing environmental issues. Due to rapid industrialisation, pollutants emitted by agricultural and industrial activities have induced various thorny issues, such as global warming and pollution-related problems, posing a fatal threat to human health. The necessity of collaboration, as a result, can emerge as a plausible solution to prevent the environment from being severely damaged. Another issue demanding global action is rising sea levels. As sea levels rise, numerous coastal cities can be submerged, leading to the loss of cultural and architectural heritages of many countries. Therefore, only by cooperation can these environmental issues be addressed, safeguarding human health.
On the other hand, others claim that fostering a sustainable economy is the fundamental focus of international cooperation. The legacy of prolonged wars has required various nations, which experienced devastating destructions, to stay connected with others to strengthen their economies. For instance, having encountered severe damage from the American war, the Vietnamese government decided to reform the nation by gradually establishing strategic partnerships with powerful nations across the globe to facilitate bilateral trade activities. These commercial activities have allowed state and private enterprises to grow and extend their business activities during the last three decades. As a result, Vietnam has become more economically sustainable due to its collaboration with other nations.
In conclusion, despite the arguments over the chief purpose of international cooperation, I contend that nations establishing partnerships can achieve financial gain and mitigate environmental issues. Admittedly, reducing the detrimental impacts of environmental catastrophes can contribute to a more sustainable global economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MinhGoal1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- All large companies should provide sports and community facilities to the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can learn just as much from books films and the internet Do you agree or disagree 84
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 84
- University education should be free for all students To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...oth viewpoints have significant merits, I believe environmental protection and tr...
^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...f purpose of international cooperation, I contend that nations establishing partn...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22741433022 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47031829285 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619937694704 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0164786529 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.266666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130719154816 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426979020423 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057805803905 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085451038273 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793281937437 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.85 12.4159519038 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.