Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money.
Nowadays, the number of people who think that is developing the technology for space exploration, it is just waste of money and time are significantly larger. Other part of people do not agree with these sentences. To my way of thinking, there are much more reasons why people decide waste less money for the exploration of space than people who think that is the best way to develop our world. It seems to me that I more agree with the first part of people and I have some reasons to confirm that.
Firstly, we can notice that scientists are looking for water on Mars last thousand years and nothing to have happened since that time. No one researches did not achieve success. Secondly, the need of humanity should always come first. While people on the Earth needs help, there are spend a lot of money on sending spacecraft or robots onto other planet. In addition, the important case that in our century we have a huge problem with ecology of our environmental; it must be noticeably by our government. The last one reason but also significant, that we take much time and money to learn Mars and other planet, while we know so little about our own.
Nevertheless, we cannot deny that space exploration gives us large opportunities in the future such as to live in the other country or cheap travel by spacecraft. Moreover, to consider the weather forecast technology possible due to satellites in space.
In conclusion, I would like to say that we would also depend on space however, we should be a limit money and time for developing space exploration and do not forget about our environmental.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 75
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ople on the Earth needs help, there are spend a lot of money on sending spacecraft or...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70818505338 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66596739015 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1203921986 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315625172798 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105019729756 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112680959412 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185665347545 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124743186082 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.