Some people think that newly built houses should be the same as the old house style in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about the design of newly constructed houses in local areas. While those who support that these new houses should be designed similarly to the old ones have their own arguments, I firmly believe that building the houses in their own styles is more reasonable.
On the one hand, there are some good reasons why people tend to force the same style for all of the houses of local residents. Firstly, these constructions would help these areas seem more correlative which can create the typically aesthetical beauty for the whole region. In fact, there are many regions that people know clearly because of the signature style of the houses, so it is unacceptable if the new one is built and breaks this beauty as a result of their own styles. Secondly, the similarity of the design of houses in some ways might reduce the unfairness or the gaps between local residents. Thanks to that, everyone can be evaluated with the same status, no one is more outstanding and no one is left.
On the other hand, I am in more favor of the opinion that people should build their own houses in their own interests as well as financial capability. To begin with, people have rights to design their own accommodation because these are not only the things that might have a long-term commitment, but also are the most precious achievement in their whole lives. Therefore, it’s quite unreasonable to force them to build their houses in a design they might not even appreciate. Moreover, a variety of house’s styles can make the local areas more energetic and outgoing. Such diversity can encourage people to have innovative designs to adorn the beauty of their own houses as well as the whole area.
In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that depending on particular situations that people can consider to design for their own homes. However, I believe that people should have the opportunity to enjoy the house’s styles that they have always envisioned for themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Leon_nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | nguyenvosonghao | 95 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | anhsunrise | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | oanhnth | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 78
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment people who are already ill Agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that newly built houses should be the same as the old house style in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...people tend to force the same style for all of the houses of local residents. Firstly, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90236686391 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59748655084 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2419694124 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4285714286 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422029173692 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165707570951 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920323402501 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285568888965 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758122388935 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...people tend to force the same style for all of the houses of local residents. Firstly, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90236686391 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59748655084 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2419694124 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4285714286 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422029173692 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165707570951 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920323402501 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285568888965 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758122388935 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.