Some people think the newly built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build house in their own style. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
While some people believe that new houses should be constructed in the same style as the more traditional houses in the locality, others contend that everyone should be free to choose their own style for a house. I agree with the view that new buildings should be built with traditional style to preserve their culture.
On the one hand, there are some who argue that it is essential to welcome change and allow individuals to have the right to live in a house with a modern style, if they so wish, irrespective of the locality. They also tend to dismiss traditional ideas on the grounds of building costs. Traditional construction materials, like natural stone from local quarries, are difficult to obtain and very expensive even if they are available, whereas new houses are built using more affordable materials. The maintenance costs of houses constructed in the old way also tend to be higher compared with their modern counterparts. Wood, for example, is nowadays commonly replaced by aluminum or plastic materials in house construction.
On the other hand, new houses should take on the existing architectural style of a local area. traditional houses possess character, and they give a strong sense of identity. Buildings which have historical significance provide a link to our roots, while a modem estate designed by property developers is certain to be incompatible with historical connections. From an architectural perspective, modem houses alongside traditional sights are an eyesore. They fail to blend in with the housing which has grown immensly over the centuries.
In conclusion, though it may be more costly, the traditional architecture of localities should be respected by modem housing developments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Leon_nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | nguyenvosonghao | 95 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | anhsunrise | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | oanhnth | 73 | view |
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why and what can we do to encourage this 78
- Discuss the pros and cons of learning online 61
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 71
- With the increasing use of and development of new technology many machines are now able to do the work which people use to perform What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 84
- The internet has made knowledge immediately available to people through computers and smartphones all around the world Much of this knowledge is also free Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Traditional
...ng architectural style of a local area. traditional houses possess character, and they give...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01395271082 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7473146169 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.692307692 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412244558845 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147757456664 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111512410216 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265228254622 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896866604165 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.