Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Some people believe that nothing is better than newspapers to collect news, while others show that there are still many ways to learn news, such as social media. In my point of view, both ways can provide news effectively to readers.
On the one hand, learning news through newspapers is a powerful method for many people. Although news from those can not be the latest, it is still attractive with its clear analysis about the issues mentioned. Moreover, newspapers seem to provide the official news, which helps readers to avoid fake news. For example, newspapers can not present what exactly happens with the war between Ukraine and Russia, but it gives its readers the overall view about the reasons and how the war affects the rest of the world in the official way.
However, with the new development in science and technology, people can search fastly updated news in other ways. As the birth and growth of the Internet, news is spreading conveniently and fastly through social media. For example, social newspapers such as BBC News or The Guardian are widely preferred to learn news by most people among different countries. Additionally, they can access other social media such as Facebook or Youtube to get the latest news. It is likely that most readers choose this way instead of newspapers.
In conclusion, I believe that people should use both newspapers and social media wisely to learn news better and avoid the fake news. Therefore, governments should invest more on the news industry to diversify the ways citizens can collect news.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-29 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | bnhi | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | kienbanhkem | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...hod for many people. Although news from those can not be the latest, it is still attracti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44032627075 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5424753523 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6153846154 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48085729118 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184404615203 0.084324248473 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100402111946 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33461791384 0.151304729494 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883731791476 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.