Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children's development than playing computer games. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary era, where modern tendency can bring some detrimental effects to the young generation, adults' attention has revolved around children's development more than ever. With regards to this topic, there is a diversion of attitudes about children's relaxation, whether outdoor activities bring more advantages than computer games. This essay will throw some light on both notions of the concepts and leave my viewpoint.
To commence, it is rational for those who advocate playing in the open space rather than sitting in front of computers and playing games. These people argue that playing computer games can harm children's eyes significantly. Many experts affirm that the number of short-sighted adolescent boys and girls rockets every day and the culprit is attributed to smart devices such as computers. Furthermore, children who spend too much time on video games can easily become game addicts. This will negatively affect their study. Hence, computer games are considered disadvantages for children's mental and physical development. In contrast, taking outdoor activities is a healthy stimulus to youngsters' health. For example, doing exercise and sport can help them let off steam, strengthen their physical condition. Besides, playing with friends in an external environment considerably tighten friendships. Consequently, adults would prefer outdoor activities rather than video games.
However, some empirical evidence proves that computer games can benefit children's development one way or another. Playing games is a great relaxation modality when students have to study diligently for a long time. It can refresh their mind, let the head down for a moment, which remarkably boosts their energy. Besides, there are different types of games that are dedicated to enhance children's intelligence. These educational ones a specially designed to force youngsters to come up with solutions to confront various situations. As a result, their problem-solving skills can be cultivated. Hence, as long as adults can confine the types of games the amount of time that the young generation play, computer games might be a promising impulse to children's well-rounded development.
By and large, I pen down that both outdoor activities and computer games beneficially impact youngsters' growth. They need a balance between them to thrive sane and happy. Consequently, it is adults' involvement to support them in this progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-10 | quytnee | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-15 | jasdandiwal | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | ngonguyetminhthu | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | immtee | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | TiaraNGuyen@99 | 89 | view |
- Some people say that art e g painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 67
- Some people say that art e g painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 84
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, well, for example, in contrast, such as, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59459459459 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94096280752 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591891891892 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7124730536 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0869565217 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336683807903 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878561401423 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713709171682 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18987164503 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540238112902 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.