Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Bringing up children is the task almost every adult person faces in their life. The role of parents and school teachers in this process will be discussed in this essay as well as my view of the issue.
On the one hand, it is very natural for children to learn how to behave in the family. Parents or other relatives show examples, while children usually “mirror” them. If parents abide by the laws, respect elders, show empathy and compassion, also explaining why it is important, children will most probably act in a similar way. Secondly, in many countries very little children, aged up to five or seven, often do not go to schools or kindergartens, spending all their time at home, while psychologists say it is early development and learning that matters most in forming personality.
On the other hand, school is the first place where a child faces real-life situations, which might be quite challenging. Therefore, what is socially acceptable or not can be learnt there easily. For example, how to communicate with elders, how to make friends with peers, or how to resolve conflicts if they happen. Furthermore, many school subjects focus on teaching socially approved behavior patterns and ways to distinguish between good and bad. For instance, Russian literature, which is a compulsory discipline in every Russian school, is the rich source of discussion themes related to human values and social norms. (Lastly, schools often organize activities, which can influence children in a positive way. Meeting with role models, such as war veterans or famous sportsmen, can teach how to be heroic or how to achieve goals.)
In conclusion, I believe that both parents and school teachers should participate in the process of bringing children up equally, as cooperation can bring better results.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Julian Eta | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | koreets01 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Cho Oo | 61 | view |
- A coal plant 61
- We often hear that new technology presents a threat to our traditions In what ways however can new technologies help maintain our traditions 77
- We often hear that new technology presents a threat to our traditions In what ways however can new technologies help maintain our traditions 77
- Pie chartTopic: Time spent on leisure activities by men and women between the age of 21 and 40 , in the US. 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ortant, children will most probably act in a similar way. Secondly, in many countries very littl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ctivities, which can influence children in a positive way. Meeting with role models, such as war ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13175675676 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85726738322 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5952857381 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258033962366 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812725488395 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470774287161 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15152372356 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238365650077 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.