Some people think that paying taxes is their only responsibility towards society, while
others feel that everyone should do more. What is your opinion?
The extent of social responsibility has always been a controversial issue in all the societies. It is argued that taxation ought not to be the only people’s obligation contributing to society. Even though taxes are considered to be a crucial source of governmental influence, I believe that individuals should provide additional support to charity and environment.
Without a doubt, compulsory financial charges play a vital role in todays’ world, therefore people accomplish a duty of transferring money to the authorities. Taxpayers assist the government to reinforce public sectors that improve the living standards for citizens. Proceeding from this, some people say that by providing funds to the tax office, individuals remove the burden of any extra aid to the society from themselves. For example, by levying high taxes in China, the senators bid assure people that every sphere of life is surely to improve, therefore nobody should worry about anything. In other words, taxation system is regarded as a significant element of social responsibility.
At the same time, voluntary aid towards the most volnurable groups of people as well as environment ought to be taken into consideration by every human being. Though the governmental role in regulating allocation of money cannot be underestimated, it is crystal clear that some social groups are unlikely to survive without additional assistance. Hence, humans should not only pay taxes but also render support to charity organisations. Moreover, raising awareness of environmental issues would not be viable if people did not put an effort into tackling sustainability and spread a word about the threats the Earth has faced. Therefore, individuals ought to concern about charity and nature.
The main conclusion to be drawn is that, although taxes serve a robust cushion to allot money to public services, people’s social responsibility should extend to voluntary contributions to charity and conserving the nature.
- All people should be vegetarian To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- All people should be vegetarian To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- High salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 81
- Some believe that people are naturally born as leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56862745098 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19440892279 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5456216841 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171494341121 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564111579485 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477360947147 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107427355723 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127975234776 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.