Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Water consumption is indeed a controversy for its importance in daily lives. Whereas one school of thought holds the view that the general public should be given to accessing fresh water sources without restrictions, others state that it is the responsibility of government agencies to monitor its use. Personally, I contend that water should be used under the regulation of the state to ensure its quality.
For one thing, the option to provide the masses with unlimited access to fresh water supply could be justified to some extent. The chief explanation is that this form of permission allows people in impoverished areas to lead a healthier life. There is a stark reality in many countries that the disadvantaged are often derelicted with regards to fundamental requirements such as poor living conditions, heavy exposure to polluted environments. Therefore, a minor improvement in water quality could fervently alleviate their situation, especially in terms of health illnesses that primarily stem from detrimental particles in contaminated water. Since this one aspect is effectively addressed, it can accompany betterment in poverty, which is beneficial to this social class.
For another, states should thoroughly regulate this natural resource since excessive consumption poses an existential threat to the purity of water. Water in many regions is now exploited in frenzy for industrial activities, but in the meantime, the deposit is usually directly discharged to its origin such as reservoirs and rivers without undergoing any filter processing. This pollutant factor takes a heavy toll on the local’s health whose household water consumption is pumped from the contaminated sources. On this grounds, legislations and policies should be enacted simultaneously to ensure public health and thus, enhance law-abiding awareness for companies to operate in tandem with not wreaking havoc on the environment.
To conclude, notwithstanding the equal water accessibility for individuals of all classes, I believe the official intervention of states is imperative to govern its use as well as secure the quality of such an invaluable natural resource.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write Why is this What measures can governments take to solve these problems 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more fathers stay at home to take care of their children What are the causes of it Is this a positive or negative development 73
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can we do to encourage this 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hool of thought holds the view that the general public should be given to accessing fresh wate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...umped from the contaminated sources. On this grounds, legislations and policies shou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not wreaking havoc on the environment. To conclude, notwithstanding the equal w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as to, such as, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57750759878 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14556625726 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4123387614 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.153846154 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242813017701 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846654626878 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745010031129 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149698102121 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785949597642 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hool of thought holds the view that the general public should be given to accessing fresh wate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...umped from the contaminated sources. On this grounds, legislations and policies shou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not wreaking havoc on the environment. To conclude, notwithstanding the equal w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as to, such as, as well as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57750759878 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14556625726 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604863221884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4123387614 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.153846154 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242813017701 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846654626878 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745010031129 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149698102121 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785949597642 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.