Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals believe that people should be entitle to use fresh water, while others suggest strict limitation of fresh water use. The two ideas have their merits and drawbacks which will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, some may argue that water is of great importance to survival of human, thereby access to water should be free. Water and food are the two major factors that fuel human's body function. Without them, people's live could face fatal consequences. Secondly, if political leaders restrict the entry to fresh water, certain group of people may be negatively impacted. This includes the impoverished individuals and people from either less developed regions or nations, with whom the cost of water constituting a large amount of their daily expenditure. Finally, fresh water provides people with needed minerals which are fundamental for human being's health. Thus, government should secure the fresh water access for their citizens.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why the authorities should impose stricter policies regarding the use of water. First, the increase of human activities are contributing to the destruction of water resources. Waste dump, industrialization and deforestation cause contamination and loss of water bodies. Likewise, Natural phenomenon such as climate change also cause exacerbate the depletion of fresh water. Due to these changes, the need to limit the use of of water is necessary. By introducing taxes and legislations on the use of water, governments are able to gain more finance and curb the reckless use of warpter. More importantly, the finance from water related taxes can be harnessed to maintain and preserve the valuable water resources.
In sum, allowing free use of water is of great importance to public health while restriction use of it would alliviate the impacts of human on the resources. Therefore, the role of the two suggestions are of equal importance. Government should manage to choose which areas to apply legislative methods, and where people can be granted to use water without limitation.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that now they can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'entitled'?
Suggestion: entitled
...dividuals believe that people should be entitle to use fresh water, while others sugges...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 652, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...inerals which are fundamental for human beings health. Thus, government should secure ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...hese changes, the need to limit the use of of water is necessary. By introducing taxe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, likewise, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3081570997 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8269875162 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567975830816 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4292157457 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4736842105 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436646876756 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141844672575 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114271437688 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305486879621 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714012161897 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.