Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Nowadays, water is extremely important for living creatures to survive in the world, while several people believe that the government has to manage its consumption, others feel that this should be in limitless access. There are arguments on both sides, however, which we will discuss here.
On the one side, objectors of uncontrolled water argue that this might be one of preventive measures, in order that water scarcity can be overcome, particularly in poor countries. It is clear that this could influence public lifestyle to supply drinkable water without any longer consuming contaminated ones. Furthermore, this brings a great change of the equal distribution based on functional building sectors. In fact, excessive use of water both in housing and tourism sectors seem uncontrollable, thereby afflicting the inadequate water use among society as a whole.
On the flip side, exponents of this view claim that free access to water consumption is related to basic human needs in almost every activity. Globally, million people access it for household activities including cooking and bathing. To create good sanitation and hygiene precludes poor health condition such as skin allergies and water-borne diseases. In addition, several crucial sectors such as agricultural land need abundant water for irrigation. Focusing on watering their plants, there will be fewer chance to face crops failure they have grown, not to mention maintaining local agricultural stock for a nation.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, despite water access restriction, to freely consume water stock considers more favoured. Those include inescapable use for basic human needs as well as irrigation purposes. This is as long as lack of its supply should strictly be supervised by authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both th
- Today the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...eds in almost every activity. Globally, million people access it for household activiti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50729927007 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91117594602 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653284671533 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8756826068 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264454563933 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810611636912 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531838738762 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161729441782 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311568293383 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.