Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is true that freshwater has been a perennial problem in many countries because of their scarcity. Disregarding the difficulty of processing as well as searching for freshwater, there are some individuals who believe that they must have their own permission to use water as much as they want. There are some ideas that the government should have a method of controlling the amount of water. Whether free freshwater is beneficial or not remains controversial, I will discuss both views of this statement in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, freshwater is rarely discovered in the natural environment, the amount of freshwater in use in daily life is processed via a variety of stages. Meanwhile, while the water flux still delivers annually to people, most think that there are no limitations on water. As a consequence, people are abusing and wasting a colossal tons of litter. This evidence is provided by the evaporation of water in some African countries, where they still face starvation and evaporation, which is harmful to the life of civilians here. Nevertheless, water pollution leaves grave repercussions that risk health, such as the risk of intestinal diseases, skin diseases, and other disadvantages.
On the other hand, as the demand to spend water freely is increasing during recent years, the government should have a preventive solution. Global warming is also a consequence of abusing water, as this is happening, the government should promote the awareness of residents about the vital role of water. Besides educational training about the consequences and importance of water, the government should reduce the amount of water delivered, as an alternative solution for this problem. The major influence to the water flux are individuals that must pay attention to the later repercussions.
In conclusion, water is considerably an essential consumption source that is extremely important. As the demand for fresh water is increasing, the residents should look after the risk along with the reduction of water coming from the government policies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ton'?
Suggestion: ton
...ople are abusing and wasting a colossal tons of litter. This evidence is provided by...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reely is increasing during recent years, the government should have a preventive ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08363718442 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544072948328 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1622272079 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211761235105 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713496558915 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516560945213 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129641745455 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787522226077 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.