Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change job. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In recent decade witnessed a trend in job hopping, raising many questions of career satisfaction. Although the proposal of changing job frequently sounds reasonable, I think a permanent occupation would pay dividends.
There are myriad of benefits when it comes to usually switching to another job. First, a stable occupation would conducive to bigger promotion if individuals work with high commitment and dedication. This act as an incentive for an increase in their remuneration as well as other benefits in kind, improving living standards. Second, A permanent work would offer people more opportunity to cultivate a camaraderie with other colleagues and gain support from them. This could culminate in a more comfortable working environment, increasing work efficiency especially in doing teamwork.
However, changing work places constantly could be fraught with some considerable drawbacks. First, When working in a new company, a newcomer maybe susceptible to some occupational hazards of discrimination in terms of races, gender-role or experience inadequacy. For example, some Asian officers have to handle with office politics such as ostracism or even malicious prosecution from other Western colleagues just due to their prejudices against the Asian social norms. In addition, On the grounds of competitive employment market, the likelihood of finding a more satisfying occupation than the previous one is impossible. In fact, There are many young people leaving white-collar jobs to run their own business and subsequently are on the verge of bankruptcy.
In conclusion that I believe that a permanent job would offer more positive benefits than chaning job frequently. Individuals should consider their own working competence to opt for the most suitable job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some groups of people have benefited from the modern communications technology but some people have not benefited at all Do you agree or disagree 89
- Internet Users as percentage of population 94
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior 73
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ostracism or even malicious prosecution from other Western colleagues just due t...
^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tly are on the verge of bankruptcy. In conclusion that I believe that a perman...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66044776119 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14800454464 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626865671642 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2774361257 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188532155016 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636200423442 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427734591787 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121105045732 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283735689425 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.